Arizona Attorney General Files Criminal Charges Against Kalshi
Arizona attorney general Kris Mayes has taken legal action against prediction market platform Kalshi for allegedly running an illegal gambling business in the state without proper licensing. The charges also include accusations of accepting bets on election outcomes, which is prohibited in Arizona.
The complaint, consisting of 20 counts, was filed in Maricopa County court, outlining the company’s involvement in unlicensed gambling activities. The document asserts that Kalshi allowed Arizona residents to place bets on various events, including state elections, which violates state laws. Specifically, the complaint includes four counts related to election wagering, such as betting on the 2028 presidential race and other local political contests.
This legal action marks a significant development in the ongoing conflict between states and the prediction market industry. According to reports, this is the first instance where a state has pursued criminal charges against Kalshi, signaling a new phase in the regulatory landscape.
Attorney General Mayes emphasized the seriousness of the charges, stating, “Kalshi may present itself as a ‘prediction market,’ but it is essentially operating an illegal gambling operation and facilitating bets on Arizona elections, both of which are clear violations of Arizona statutes.” Mayes added, “No entity has the authority to choose which laws to adhere to.”
While the charges are classified as misdemeanors, they follow a series of cease-and-desist letters and legal actions from various states against Kalshi. The company has faced criticism for allegedly circumventing state gambling laws and regulations.
In response, prediction sites like Kalshi have argued that they fall under federal oversight through the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, thereby complying with regulatory standards at a national level.
Techcrunch event
San Francisco, CA
|
October 13-15, 2026
Kalshi, in turn, has taken legal steps of its own in response to regulatory challenges. The company filed a lawsuit against Arizona’s Department of Gaming in federal court, arguing that state regulations encroach on federal jurisdiction over derivatives trading on exchanges. Similar lawsuits have been initiated against Iowa and Utah on comparable grounds.
Mayes’ office has criticized Kalshi’s approach, accusing the company of evading accountability by resorting to legal action against states rather than complying with established laws. Mayes stated, “Instead of adhering to the legal frameworks established by states like Arizona, Kalshi is engaging in a pattern of litigation against state authorities. This behavior seeks to avoid regulatory oversight and accountability.”
Elisabeth Diana, Kalshi’s head of communications, dismissed the criminal charges filed by Arizona as a strategic move related to the company’s ongoing legal battles with the state. Diana characterized the charges as a tactic to bypass federal court proceedings and hinder a fair evaluation of the case based on jurisdictional issues.
On a broader scale, federal officials have shown support for the prediction industry, setting the stage for a potential clash between states and federal regulatory bodies. The chair of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Michael Selig, recently penned an op-ed condemning state governments for challenging the agency’s authority to regulate prediction markets. Selig vowed to defend the CFTC’s jurisdiction and prevent state interference in federal oversight of the industry.