Telegram’s founder, Pavel Durov, faced arrest in France last year after alleging that the French authorities requested him to censor certain Moldovan voices on the platform during parliamentary voting. Durov claimed that in exchange for complying with the censorship request, he was offered a favorable outcome in court.
Currently under judicial supervision in France, Durov shared that an intermediary approached him on behalf of French Intelligence with a list of channels to censor. While the channels mentioned in the first list were found to be violating Telegram’s rules and were removed, the second list mainly contained legal channels with political content. Durov refused to censor these channels, citing the compromise on the principle of free speech. The authorities allegedly offered to speak positively about him in court if he complied with their demands.
In response to Durov’s claims, the French authorities dismissed them as “baseless,” stating that similar accusations made in the past were unfounded. Earlier this year, Durov had alleged that French intelligence requested him to ban conservative voices on Telegram during Romania’s election, which was also denied by the government. The French Foreign Ministry emphasized the need for responsibility during elections and refuted Durov’s allegations.
Despite the controversy, Durov continues to defend Telegram as an encrypted messaging service where the management has no access to users’ private chats. However, French authorities express concerns about the potential misuse of the platform for criminal and illegal activities.
The ongoing dispute between Telegram’s founder and the French authorities highlights the complex relationship between technology, free speech, and government regulations. As the debate continues, it raises important questions about online censorship, privacy, and the responsibilities of tech companies in safeguarding user data.